Blog #2


Newton’s Law of Inertia: An object in motion stays in motion.
Though Newton was probably
referring to objects more like soccer balls, trains or motorcycles this same
principle also aptly describes the motile state of human nature. History is simply
the study of this motion watching leaders and people rise and fall, documenting
the fluidity of the human race. This motion can be seen in just about every
area of study from art to science and extending into human morality. Sadly, the
direction social morality usually takes is a downhill slide as a people become
proud and greedy, seeking only personal gain which leads to the eventual
destruction of the greater whole. Elder Ezra
Taft Benson stated in a 1973 Conference talk “Our greatest national problem is
erosion. Not erosion of the soil, but erosion of the national morality.”1
Though Elder Benson was referring to the United States in his address a
parallel can be drawn to the Roman Empire. For the major part of three
centuries The Roman Empire dominated as power supreme and ruled over vast
amounts of land “Your task, Roman, and do not forget it, will be to govern the
peoples of the world in your empire”2. However, as Roman morals
degraded so did their power and the once glimmering city of marble eroded away
revealing the coarse brickwork underneath.
Histories which describe the
downward motion of nations often exhibit a similar pattern. One element of this
pattern is the desire to acquire more; more land, more power, more money. In
the historical account of Polybius he describes the moral character of the
Roman people and how character is superior to all other elements of society. Polybius
specifically mentions that character is of greater importance than the desire
to acquire more wealth. “Again, the Roman customs and principles regarding the
acquisition of wealth are better that those of the Carthaginians… For they [the
Romans] regard wealth obtained from unlawful transactions to be as much a
subject of reproach as a fair profit from reputable sources is of commendation…
With such a radical difference, therefore, between the rewards offered to
virtue among the two peoples, it is natural that the ways adopted for obtaining
them should be different also.”3 (Polybius, 56) Money and wealth
were desired in the time of Polybius, yet they were secondary to a person’s
character, a man’s virtue was his greatest possession. However, as the Roman
empire continued in its downward motion and the social morality eroded away
greed found root and wealth became the premier concern. This change is appropriately
described by the satirist Juvenal “The first question asked will be as to his
wealth, the last about his character: 'how many slaves does he keep?' 'how many
acres does he own?' 'how big and how many are his dessert dishes?' A man's word
is believed in exact proportion to the amount of cash which he keeps in his
strong-box.”4 (Juvenal, 132-133) The Romans now valued money above virtue,
and this was the initial push the empire required to begin their declining
motion.
As a byproduct of this new
“monetary driven” society the Romans who found themselves in power were those
willing to surreptitiously seize control. A notion that in the time of Polybius
was punishable by death “The Carthaginians obtain office by open bribery, but
among the Romans the penalty for it is death.”3 (Polybius, 56) How
ironic that Polybius praised the Romans for their high moral character and held
them in high esteem compared with the “lowly and unethical” Carthaginians, when
years later Juvenal would describe the corrupt state to which Roman politics
had fallen. In deed much worse than the bribery Carthage took part in. “No man
will get my help in robbery, and therefore no governor will take me on his staff...
What man wins favour nowadays unless he be an accomplice-one whose soul seethes
and burns with secrets that must never be disclosed?”4 (Juvenal, 43-45)
This corruption of leaders and eventually the entire society is yet another
element repeated in the motion of a falling state.
Finally, the ethical character had
so eroded away in Rome after years of prosperity that every aspect of Roman society
had become dangerous. The life of Roman citizens was threatened and not from a
foreign enemy, but by the enemy all around them. The populace no longer
protected one another as described in Polybius “Many Romans have volunteered to
decide a whole battle by single combat; not a few have deliberately accepted
certain death, some in time of war to secure the safety of the rest, some in
time of peace to preserve the safety of the commonwealth.”3 (Polybius,
54) Instead a countryman would rob or assault his neighbor if he thought it
would benefit his own position. "Your drunken bully…will get no rest in
any other way, since some men can only sleep after a brawl…But to me he pays no
respect. Hear how the wretched fray begins--if fray it can be called when you
do all the thrashing and I get all the blows!”4 (Juvenal, 278-283) “Nor
are these your only terrors. When your house is shut… you will be robbed by a
burglar; or perhaps a cut-throat will do for you quickly with cold steel.”4
(Juvenal, 302-303) The morality of Rome and it’s citizens had spiraled in a
downward motion until almost at the brink, its people had become money hungry putting
all virtues aside in lieu of the pursuit for more.
BUT…
Newton’s Law of Inertia Continued: An object in motion stays
in motion--- Unless acted upon by
another force
Rome found Christianity and adopted
the faith as their national religion, stopping the Roman empire on it’s suicide
journey to collapse. Christianity effectively revitalized the morality of the
people and once again established virtue above greed, honor over power, and
loyalty over selfishness.
So What
As the writer George Santayana is
attributed with saying “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to
repeat it.” We should learn from Roman history and as we prospers we must not allow our personal morality or the morality of our society to erode. As a church our values grow ever different from those
of changing society. As prophets and apostles have warned, we must resist the
temptation to lower our values in anyway, we must “love to 'stand in holy
places' and love to make holy the places where we stand.”5
References
1-
“Watchman, Warn the Wicked”, Ezra Taft Benson,
April 1973
2- Virgil, and Stanley Lombardo. Aeneid. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co,
2005. Print.
3-
Finley, M. I. The Greek Historians: The Essence
of Herodotus, Thucydides, Xenophon, Polybius. Penguin Books, 1982
4-
Juvenal. Satire III, The Satires of Juvenal Translated:
The Loeb Classical Library: translated by Frank Schaer, 1999. Print.
5-
“Pure Love: The True Sign of Every True Disciple
of Jesus Christ”, Massimo De Feo, April 2018

It’s really interesting how you and Isaac both had the same idea of relating the social changes in Rome to laws of physics. Had you talked about it together before or did you both come up with that independently?
ReplyDeleteReading through your essay I do have one question: at the end of the post, you say that Rome’s adoption of Christianity stopped it from collapsing. But didn’t the Roman Empire last less than a century after adopting Christianity before it collapsed? I don’t know enough about the Roman Empire to know if their morals changed after Christianity started spreading, but doesn’t it seem like it didn’t prevent the empire from failing?
I LOVE the way you alluded to the marble breaking away to reveal the coarse brick underneath, and I think that is a good way to represent the fall of Roman morals. The romans went from being clean, clear, and well-defined to being all craggy and rough. Coming in contact with rough brick will hurt, and it seems that coming in contact with a roman during Juvenal's time would surely hurt too.
ReplyDeleteI love the way you applied Newton's law of inertia as well, and specifically that you pointed out that another force acting upon an object in motion can slow or speed or redirect its course. I think it is interesting to think about how we can be that force to slow or reverse the decay of our own society. Just like Christianity brought back many roman morals, I think that following Christ will help us to have all the right morals to stop the decay.
I am a fan of Newton, he had a great first name. I agree with you that greed was the force that caused the downward momentum in the Romans’ morals. It is so interesting how it is our priorities that cause an impact on our trajectory.
ReplyDeleteThat is ironic! I had not thought that the very same example given by Polybus became a part of their society. I’m a fan of the outside sources. They help to see how we can avoid the same fate as the Romans.
I like the way you connected the Newton’s first of motion and the fall of Roma together. That is very interesting. You also used some specific examples to demonstrated why Roma changed. Those examples help me to understand the change more clearly. By the way, those pictures are funny.
ReplyDelete